Mr. Papermaster had lost the confidence of Mr. Jobs months ago and hasn't been part of the decision-making process for some time, these people said. They added that Mr. Papermaster didn't appear to have the type of creative thinking expected at Apple and wasn't used to Apple's corporate culture, where even senior executives are expected to keep on top of the smallest details of their areas of responsibility and often have to handle many tasks directly, as opposed to delegating them.
In other words, it wasn't just about the iPhone 4's antenna. In fact, the WSJ claims that Jobs knew about the risks of the antenna design as much as a year ago and it was his decision, not Papermaster's, to move forward with its development.
アンテナ問題は原因ではない (スコア:0)
だから退任／解雇の原因はアンテナ問題では無い！
WSJはそもそも社内でうまく行ってなかった説を提示 (スコア:2)
Apple iPhone Executive Leaves - WSJ.com [wsj.com]
Mr. Papermaster had lost the confidence of Mr. Jobs months ago and hasn't been part of the decision-making process for some time, these people said. They added that Mr. Papermaster didn't appear to have the type of creative thinking expected at Apple and wasn't used to Apple's corporate culture, where even senior executives are expected to keep on top of the smallest details of their areas of responsibility and often have to handle many tasks directly, as opposed to delegating them.
WSJ: Apple lost confidence in Papermaster months ago, Jobs accepted iPhone 4 antenna risks [engadget.com]
In other words, it wasn't just about the iPhone 4's antenna. In fact, the WSJ claims that Jobs knew about the risks of the antenna design as much as a year ago and it was his decision, not Papermaster's, to move forward with its development.
スーツ論争ですかねぇ。10年くらい前にも
Re:WSJはそもそも社内でうまく行ってなかった説を提示 (スコア:0)
jobsに懇意的な記事良く書いてるし。